Learning More for Children from Medicaid and CHIP Policy Experiments
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services
- Medicaid and CHIP demonstrations and their required evaluations should incorporate more rigorous designs that allow for causal inference.
- States should leverage requirements for short-term monitoring of demonstrations as a mechanism for continuous improvement.
- States and evaluators should assess secondary effects on children from Medicaid demonstrations and policy changes that affect adult parents and other caregivers.
- State Medicaid agencies should engage with child health clinicians and researchers to interpret the effects of demonstrations on children, and plan for next steps in policy.
- Child health clinicians and researchers should support the dissemination of results from monitoring and evaluation of demonstrations to better inform policy and practice.
Experiments in Medicaid policy are common, and likely to become more common in the future. The implications of these experiments for children are often overlooked and under-evaluated. States and CMS should ensure strong evaluations of whether these experiments are meeting the goals of the Medicaid program, and members of the child health care and research community should raise their awareness of these experiments, contribute to their design, and seek to understand their impacts on children.
Follow the Evidence
Interested in the most current findings from Mathematica? Subscribe to our bi-weekly newsletter, Evidence & Insights, to stay up to date with the issues that matter to you.Sign Me Up