The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures

The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures

Published: Mar 30, 2020
Publisher: American Journal of Medical Quality (online ahead of print)
Clients
Download
Authors

David R. Nerenz

David Cella

Lacy Fabian

Eugene Nuccio

John Bott

J. Matt Austin

Jack Needleman

Karen Johnson

In the summer of 2017, the National Quality Forum (NQF) announced the formation of a Scientific Methods Panel (hereafter referred to as “the Panel”) as part of a redesign of its endorsement process. NQF created the Panel in response to stakeholder request during a Kaizen improvement event held in May 2017. Given the Panel’s role in the endorsement of performance measures used in national payment programs, the objective of this article is to describe the work of the Panel, and to describe its function in the larger context of the NQF measure endorsement process and in the measurement enterprise writ large. This article also serves as an introduction to a series of planned white papers being authored by the panel on specific technical issues in the area of health care performance measurement.

Follow the Evidence

Interested in the most current findings from Mathematica? Subscribe to our bi-weekly newsletter, Evidence & Insights, to stay up to date with the issues that matter to you.

Sign Me Up