Complementary Feeding and Developmental Milestones: A Systematic Review

Complementary Feeding and Developmental Milestones: A Systematic Review

Published: Mar 28, 2019
Publisher: The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 109, issue S7
Download
Authors

Laural K. English

Julie E. Obbagy

Yat Ping Wong

Nancy F. Butte

Kathryn G. Dewey

Mary Kay Fox

Frank R. Greer

Nancy F. Krebs

Kelley S. Scanlon

Eve E. Stoody

Background

Systematic reviews were conducted as part of the USDA and the US Department of Health and Human Services Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project to examine the relation between complementary feeding and developmental milestones.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to describe systematic reviews examining the relationship between timing of introduction of complementary foods and beverages (CFB), and the types and amounts of CFB consumed, and developmental milestones.

Methods

The literature was searched using 4 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and CINAHL) to identify articles that met predetermined criteria for inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted for each included study. The body of evidence for each systematic review was qualitatively synthesized to develop a conclusion statement, and the strength of evidence was graded.

Results

Three included articles (1 randomized controlled trial; 2 observational studies) examined timing of introduction of CFB. Eight included articles (3 randomized controlled trials; 5 observational studies) examined types and amounts of CFB. There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the relation between either timing of CFB introduction or types and amounts of CFB, and developmental milestones.

Conclusions

The ability to draw conclusions about the relationship between complementary feeding and developmental milestones was restricted by an inadequate amount of evidence with potential for issues with reverse causality and wide variation in design, type/age of outcome assessment, exposure assessment, and reported results. Additional research to address these gaps and limitations would be useful.

How do you apply evidence?

Take our quick four-question survey to help us curate evidence and insights that serve you.

Take our survey