Coordinating Center for Comparative Health System Performance
Prepared for:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Prepared for:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
As consolidation of hospitals and physicians into vertically integrated health systems has increased in recent years (Furukawa et al. 2020), debate over the net benefits of health systems has grown. The promise of health systems was greater ability to provide efficient, population based care, but the reality to date has been higher prices and few, if any, gains in quality (Machta et al. 2019). Another avenue by which systems might affect patients’ outcomes and expenditures is by offering health plans (Meyers et al. 2020; Orszag and Rekhi 2020). Investing in health plans might offer a number of advantages, such as the ability to more fully benefit from value-based population health efforts by the system (Wrobel 2017). Little is known, however, about how many and which types of systems offer health plans. This analysis leverages new data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Compendium of U.S. Health Systems to describe the percentage of health systems that offered a health plan in 2018 and the system characteristics associated with offering any health plan and by type of plan.
To solve their most pressing challenges, organizations turn to Mathematica for deeply integrated expertise. We bring together subject matter and policy experts, data scientists, methodologists, and technologists who work across topics and sectors to help our partners design, improve, and scale evidence-based solutions.
Work With Us