State Partnership Initiative: Selection of Comparison Groups for the Evaluation and Selected Impact Estimates
This report, focusing on employment and earnings, describes how nonexperimental comparison groups were selected for each of the 11 state projects that targeted adult beneficiaries, the validity of the comparison groups, and short-term project effects on employment and earnings in 3 state projects that used randomized designs. The report finds promising results on employment, but negative or no effect on earnings.
More like this from Mathematica
Featured Publication
Principles and Promising Practices for Hiring and Retaining Young Autistic Workers
Efficiency Meets Impact.
That's Progress Together.
To solve their most pressing challenges, organizations turn to Mathematica for deeply integrated expertise. We bring together subject matter and policy experts, data scientists, methodologists, and technologists who work across topics and sectors to help our partners design, improve, and scale evidence-based solutions.
Work With Us