Projects

Evaluation of TNTP’s EIR mid-phase proposal Turnaround Leadership Teams Strategy

2018 – 2023

Project Overview

Objective

Evaluate the effectiveness of TNTP’s Turnaround Leadership Teams Strategy in two southeastern school districts, as implemented under the U.S. Department of Education Education Research and Innovation (EIR) grant.

Project Motivation

To understand the impact of the Turnaround Leadership Teams Strategy on one- and two-year student achievement outcomes and to examine how the program was implemented under the EIR grant.

Partners in Progress

TNTP

Prepared For

TNTP

In 2017, TNTP (formerly called The New Teacher Project) received an $8 million mid-phase Education Innovation and Research (EIR) grant from the U.S. Department of Education to implement the Turnaround Leadership Teams Strategy (TLTS) in two school districts in the southeastern United States. The TLTS program aimed to support professional growth for school leaders and teacher leaders; improve instructional practices, school culture, and family engagement in school activities; and, ultimately, increase student achievement. 

TNTP contracted Mathematica to conduct an independent evaluation of the effectiveness of the EIR-funded program, a requirement for all EIR grantees. This evaluation utilized a rigorous random assignment design. Under the EIR grant, TNTP added a new cohort of TLTS schools each program year while continuing supports to schools already enrolled in the program. In collaboration with the two participating districts, TNTP and Mathematica used school performance data to identify the elementary and middle schools in the participating districts most likely to benefit from program participation. From these identified schools, Mathematica randomly selected an intervention group of schools to participate in TLTS and a comparison group of schools to proceed as usual (without TNTP supports). After two years of program implementation, to evaluate the impact of the TLTS program, Mathematica collected and analyzed data from each school on (a) student achievement after one and two years of program implementation and (b) teacher perceptions and practices after two years of program implementation. The final evaluation report presents the final findings from this impact evaluation, as well as findings related to analyses of implementation fidelity, scale-up fidelity, and per-student costs. 

Related Staff

Marykate  Zukiewicz

Marykate Zukiewicz

Senior Researcher

View Bio Page
Naihobe Gonzalez

Naihobe Gonzalez

Senior Researcher

View Bio Page
Daniel Welsh

Daniel Welsh

Survey Analyst

View Bio Page

See Clearly. Act Quickly.

Our experts can help you make smart, sustainable decisions. From local to global challenges in health, human services, and international development, we’re here to improve public well-being and make progress together.

Work With Us