Out-of-Pocket Drug Costs and Drug Utilization Patterns of Postmenopausal Medicare Beneficiaries with Osteoporosis

Out-of-Pocket Drug Costs and Drug Utilization Patterns of Postmenopausal Medicare Beneficiaries with Osteoporosis

Published: Aug 01, 2011
Publisher: The Anerican Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy, vol. 9, issue 4
Download
Authors

Dominick Esposito

Susan Garavaglia

Eric S. Meadows

Margaret Colby

Vivian Herrara

Seth Goldfarb

Martin Marciniak

Key Findings
  • Medication discontinuation and OOP costs among beneficiaries with osteoporosis were highest for those enrolled in Part D plans with a coverage gap.
  • Providers should be aware of potential cost-related nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries taking osteoporosis medications.

The Medicare Part D coverage gap has been associated with lower adherence and drug utilization and higher discontinuation. Because osteoporosis has a relatively high prevalence among Medicare-eligible postmenopausal women, we examined changes in utilization of osteoporosis medications during this coverage gap.

More than half the sample reached the coverage gap; OOP costs then rose for teriparatide users enrolled in partial- or full-gap exposure plans (increase of 121% and 186%; $300 and $349) but fell for those in no-gap exposure PDPs or RDS plans (decrease of 49% and 30%; $131 and $40). OOP costs for beneficiaries in partial- or full-gap exposure PDPs increased >120% (increase of $144 and $176) in the NTO group and nearly doubled for the OCC group (increase of $124 and $151); these OOP costs were substantially lower than those for teriparatide users. Both teriparatide users and NTO group members discontinued or skipped medications more often than persons in the OCC group, regardless of plan or benefit design.

How do you apply evidence?

Take our quick four-question survey to help us curate evidence and insights that serve you.

Take our survey