Mathematica is continuously monitoring this fluid situation, and we are proactively working to minimize any potential impacts on our clients, partners, staff, and the important work that we do together. Learn more.
Transparency in the Reporting of Quality for Integrated Data: A Review of International Standards and Guidelines
Publisher: Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research
Apr 27, 2018
- Only one national statistical organization—Stats NZ—has developed a quality framework explicitly designed to address integrated data.
- Eurostat’s quality standards and guidelines, which apply to most of Europe and are perhaps the most extensive, deal with integrated data to a much more limited degree and instead focus on quality more generally.
- Many of the quality assurance frameworks and the associated standards and guidelines reviewed in this report are associated with extensive prescriptions for quality assessments and their communication to data users in detailed quality reports. The volume and types of information requested in Eurostat quality reports bears substantial resemblance to what was included in the quality profiles prepared by a number of U.S. federal agencies in the 1990s and early 2000s but, for multiple reasons, not continued.
- Efforts to deal with quality aspects of administrative data are much farther along than efforts to deal with the quality of other forms of Big Data.