Mathematica is continuously monitoring this fluid situation, and we are proactively working to minimize any potential impacts on our clients, partners, staff, and the important work that we do together. Learn more.
Millions Would Lose SNAP Eligibility Under Provisions of House Farm Bill
About one in 11 households receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits would lose eligibility under certain provisions of the House Farm Bill—H.R. 2, the Agriculture Improvement Act—according to a microsimulation conducted by Mathematica Policy Research. Using SNAP data from fiscal year 2015, the analysis, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, found that nearly 2 million participating households would no longer be eligible. Among these households, 34 percent (677,000 households) include seniors, 23 percent (469,000 households) include children, and 11 percent (214,000 households) include a person with a disability. Of the households with children losing eligibility, more than half (53 percent) live in poverty.
The impact assessment also found that an estimated 283,000 households would become newly eligible for SNAP under those provisions and choose to participate in the program. The microsimulation model, developed for the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service, estimates the effects of proposed changes to SNAP eligibility, participation, and benefits. Because the number of SNAP-participating households has decreased since 2015, the number of households losing and gaining eligibility would likely be somewhat smaller if the provisions of H.R. 2 were enacted this year.
“A microsimulation model is useful in providing detailed estimates about the characteristics of households impacted by bills like H.R. 2,” said Mathematica senior researcher Karen Cunnyngham. “These results can provide valuable insights for lawmakers and their staffs as they weigh proposed changes to SNAP.”
Specifically, the model assessed proposed changes to:
- Countable resources: the amount of available cash, resources easily converted to cash, and some non-liquid resources that a household can have and still qualify for SNAP. Under H.R. 2, most households would be permitted to have up to $7,000 (up from $2,250) in countable resources; households with at least one member who is elderly or has a disability would be allowed $12,000 (up from $3,500); and states would no longer have the flexibility to exclude some or all of a vehicle’s value from a household’s countable resources; instead, federal rules would increase the excluded amount of a vehicle’s value (from $4,650 to $12,000).
- Broad-based categorical eligibility (BBCE): the ability of households to qualify for SNAP if they already meet the financial criteria to receive a non-cash benefit or service through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families-funded program. Under H.R. 2, BBCE would be eliminated.
“SNAP serves a crucial role in protecting our nation’s children and families who are struggling to gain access to necessities like affordable food,” said Jasmine Hall Ratliff, program officer, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. “The findings of this impact assessment demonstrate that those who rely on SNAP—two-thirds of whom are children, older adults, and people with disabilities—should have access to benefits without undue barriers to eligibility, enrollment, or utilization.”
The impact assessment released today is the first in a series of research briefs that will use microsimulation modeling to test the effects of proposed changes to SNAP under H.R. 2. Upcoming briefs will estimate the impact of other provisions, such as work requirements, on SNAP-eligible households.
Mathematica Media Contact:
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Media Contact:
USDA Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment and Training (E&T) Characteristics Study (Summary)
This study was conducted to better understand the characteristics of SNAP work registrants and SNAP E&T participants, the barriers they face when trying to find work, their training needs, and the services they receive through SNAP E&T programs, and the characteristics of E&T service providers.
SNAP Employment and Training (E&T) Characteristics Study: Final Report
This report describes the characteristics of SNAP work registrants and SNAP E&T participants, the barriers they face when trying to find work, their training needs, and the services they receive through SNAP E&T programs, as well as the characteristics of E&T service providers.
A video examining a study of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The largest, most rigorous national study of food security among SNAP participants. James Mabli, the study's lead author, highlights key findings.